I am conscious of the fact that, strictly speaking, the word 'terrorism'
applies to acts of
terror, attempts to cause bomb explosions, and so on. But I do not
believe that this is the only type of terrorism the world is suffering
from. I believe that whenever repressive measures are
taken by governments against their own countrymen to still the voice of
disagreement, those measures too should be included within the term
'terrorism' and be as strongly and roundly
condemned as any other form of terrorism. I consider all oppressive
measures taken by governments against the left or right within their own
countries as terrorism of the worst type. When acts of
terrorism are directed against foreign governments and take the form of
the use of explosives here and there, or the hijacking of planes, such
events gain a great deal of attention. World opinion
sympathizes with the victims of such callous terrorist acts, as indeed
it should. Such sympathies are not merely voiced, but are generally
followed by constructive means to prevent and pre-empt
such attempts in the future. However, what about those hundreds of
thousands of people suffering under the stem and merciless hands of
their own governments? Their cries of anguish are seldom
heard outside. Their cries of protest are very often muffled by the
application of strict measures of censorship. Even if philanthropic
agencies like Amnesty International draw the attention of the
world to such cruel acts of persecution, torture, and denial of human
rights, such events are only mildly condemned, if at all, by world
governments. More often than not, these are considered to be
internal matters for the countries concerned. Instead of being described
as acts of terrorism, they are widely mentioned as government efforts
to suppress terrorism in these countries, and to
establish peace, law and order.
I am quite convinced that in essence all restrictive and punitive
measures taken by a government
against its own people to suppress a popular movement or suspected
opposition, more often than not, go beyond the limits of genuine legal
measures and end up as brutal acts of violence designed
to strike terror in the hearts of a dissatisfied section of their own
people. Humanity has suffered far more through such acts of State
terrorism than through all acts of sabotage or
hijacking put together As far as Islam is concerned, it categorically
rejects and condemns every form of terrorism. It does not provide any
cover or justification for any act of violence, be it
committed by an individual, a group or a government.
From
Murder in the Name of Allah,
Lutterworth Press, Cambridge, 1990,
pp. 115-116
The Meaning of Jihad
Hadrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad (1928-2003)
Head of the Worldwide Ahmadiyya Community in Islam
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar